Skip to main content

Full text of "fort monroe"

See other formats


rmy Reserve/USACC Trainin 
& Training Support Summit 



Purpose 


Review all Reserve training & training 
support provided to USACC, identify 
perennial requirements , coordinate an 
alternative direct commissioning 
partnership, and lay out COAs & due- 
outs for the way ahead. 




Concept 



Philosophy: 

• This is a working conference that must 
result in deliverables 


Three Working 
Groups: 


l. 

Deliverables supporting FY05: 

• LDAC & LTC Requirements 

• JROTC Requirements 

• Ranger Challenge, Bde-level FTXs,& 

Reserve CTLT Opportunities 

• Update alternative staffing initiative via 

the 8th SROTC Bdes and DIV(IT) 
community 3 

• USACC Support for the Reserve's ARG2G 
Direct Comm Initiative 

• Post deliverables on-line listing perennial 
training support requirements, Reserve 8th 
SROTC Bde status of support & alternative 
commissioning partnership & support 


SROTC Bde alternative 
staffing update and 
Reserve Partnership Way 
Ahead between the 
DIV(IT)s and USACC 

Training & Training 
Support for 

LDAC/LTC/J ROTC, Ranger 
Challenge, CTLT and Bde- 
level FTXs 

Army Reserve Green-to- 
Gold (ARG2G) Direct- 
Commissioning Program 
Way Ahead 


■ 




Attendees 



US ACC 


OCAR 


• ACOS-R: COL Harrell * PA&E: Mr. Rost 

• DOLD: LTC Jimerson, MAJ Trexler, Ms. # RM: LTC Dorney 

Visconti 


• RM: Ms. Imgrund 

• Futures: LTC Miller, Mr. Kennedy 


US. Army Reserve 
Command 


• G-l: COL Earley, MAJ Hersey 

• G-7: Mr. Hargraves, MAJ Mosley, MSG Kolasienski 

• G-8: Ms. Mesko 

DIV(IT)/SROTC Bde Community Development: COL Oskam 

84TH ARRTC: COL Rego, COL Soderberg, MSG Schuh 

80TH DIV(IT):COL Clark, COL Faison, CSM White, MAJ Peterson, 

95th DIV(IT): LTC LeCompte, 

98th DIV(IT): LTC McClellan, 

100TH DIV(IT): COL Argabright, LTC Shain 
104th DIV(IT): LTC Lee, 

108th DIV(IT): COL Dyer, Mr. Miller (Tng Off) 




Agenda 6-7-8 July 



6 June 2004 

1300-1315: COL Harrell, Welcome & Opening 
Remarks 

1315-1330: Attendee Introductions 
1330-1700: Information Briefs (10-15 min. ea) 

- DOLD Support Overview: LTC Jimerson 

- Reserve G-7 Spt Overview: MAJ Mosley 
108th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: COL Dyer 

- 104 th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: LTC Lee 

- 100th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: COL 
Argabright 

- 98th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: LTC McClellan 
95th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: LTC LeCompte 
80th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: COL Blane, COL 
Faison 

- 84th ARRTC Concept: COL Rego 

- ARG2G Review: COL Harrell 

- USACC Reserve Way Ahead: Mr. 

Kennedy 

1700-1730: Review working group objectives & 
due outs for the following day (COL Harrell) 


7 June 2004 

0800-0815: Working Group Orientation (COL 
Harrell) 

0815-1130: Working Groups in Session: 

1. Training & Training Support for LDAC, LTC, 
JROTC & CTLT. Lead: LTC Martin 

2. Alt. Staffing & Reserve Partnership Way 
Ahead Lead: LTC Miller 

3. ARG2G Way Ahead. Lead: MAJ Mosley 

1130-1200: Working Lunch (catered in place) 
1130-1145: Working Group #1 IPR 
1145-1300: Working Group #2 IPR 
1300-1315: Working Group #3 IPR 
1315-1600: Working Groups in session; refine due- 
outs 

1600-1730: Brief IPR to MG Thrasher, CG, USACC 

8 June 2004 

0800-1130: Working Groups finalize due-outs 
1130-1200: Working Lunch (catered in place) 

1130-1315: IPRs 

1300-1500: Outbrief DCG, USACC, BG Sealock 
1500-1530: Conference closing remarks 




Reserve C2 Distribution Compared 
to ROTC Bdes, AGR-R PMSs & DIV(IT)s 


Each symbol is hyperlinked to the organization's web site when in slides 




65TH RRC 

FT. BUG HUNAN. PH 

am 


70TH RRC 

FT. LAWTON, WA 


6 3RD RRC 

LOS ALAMITOS. CA 


941 H RRC 

FT. DEYENS RFTA. MA 


77TH RRC 

FT. TOTTEN, NY 


99TH RRC 

G0R0PQJ3, PA 


& 

*!► 

a 9TH RRC 

Z\ ROTCBde FT SHATTER. HI 

O AGR-R PMS 

(“) Major Reserve HQs 


90TH me 

LITTLE ROCK, AR 


£ Reserve DIV(IT) 




USAR C2 Dispersion 



Ft Douglas UT c . 

96th RSC Ft S ^" ma 


Ft Harrison 
IN 

88th RSG 


Heidelberg, 

GER 

7th A^OM 


Ft Lawton WAr 

70th RSCH 


Ft Shatter HI 

9th RSC 



Los Alamitos 
CA 

63rd RSC 



evens RFTA MA 

94th RSC 


Wichita KS 

89th RSC 


San Antonio TXN?llittl& Rock 

90th RSG AR Birmingham 

90th RSC D , At 

81st RSC 


Ft Buchanan, PR 

65th RSC 

■I 



Working Group #1 


Alt. Staffing & Reserve 
Partnership Way Ahead 



Mission Statement 



Support Active Component ROTC 
Battalions in the Total Army School 
System (TASS) with their mission to 
educate, train and inspire men and 
women to become commissioned 
officers in the U.S Army, U.S Army 
National Guard and U.S Army 
Reserve. 



14 US ACC ROTC Brigad 






USAR DIV (IT) Area of Operations - 
FY 04 


104TH DIV (IT) 
VANCOUVER, WA 
^ k REGION G 


84TH DIV (IT) 
MILWAUKEE, WI 
REGION E 


98TH DIV (IT) 
ROCHESTER, NY 
REGION A 



95TH DIV (IT) 
OKLAHOMA CITY,J)K 
REGION F jVS 


^lOOTH DIV (IT) 
LOUISVILLE, KY 
REGION D 



OTH DIV (IT) 
CHMOND, VA 
REGION B 


108TH DIV (IT) 
CHARLOTTE, NC 
REGION C 







Tasks 


Classroom Military Science I - IV Instruction 

Recruiting Cadet/SMP 

Nurse Recruiter 

Scholarship Boards 

FTX 

Rifle Marksmanship 
Ranger Challenge 
Drill Teams/Color Guards 
Physical Training 
Combat Life Saver 
Mentoring 
Newsletter 




What Reservists Offer 



■ Experience - Average of ten years or more of AD/RC 

■ Continuity - Reside in the area on permanent basis 

■ Flexibility - Support the program during weekdays, 
weekend, and summer training 

■ Professionalism - Career soldiers 

■ Enthusiasm - Dedication to program 

■ Recruiting - Identify qualified Reserve soldiers 

■ Marketing - Promote the Reserve 
Components/Citizen Soldier to new cadets 




80 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 
™ Brigade 
2 nd , 3 rd & 4 th ROTC Brigade 

Commander 
COL Larry Faison 


■ 


Command Sergeant Major 
CSM Jim White 




80 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 
™ Brigade 
2 nd f 3 rd & 4 th ROTC Brigade 



. gTH/soth Brigade 
SROTC: Richmond, VA. 
Supports Cadet 
Command ROTC 
Detachments with 51 
TPU soldiers throughout 
the 3 rd & 4 th ROTC 
Brigades. 



United States Army 

Cadet Command Headquarters 

To commission the future officer 
leadership of the US Army and motivate 
young people to be better citizens 


University 

Officers Enlisted 

Assigned 

Assigned 

Hampton University 

1 

5 

Widener University 

3 

3 

Old Dominion University 

4 

3 

University of Richmond 

1 

0 

Norfolk State University 

0 

1 

William & Mary University 

0 

1 

George Mason University 

4 

1 

U. of MD (College Park) 

2 

0 

Bowie State 

1 

1 

J ames Madison University 

5 

5 

Georgetown University 

3 

1 

University of Virginia 

3 

0 

Loyola University 

1 

0 

University of Delaware 

1 

0 

University of Pittsburgh 

1 

0 

Total 

30 

21 


m 




80 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 
Brigade 

& 4 th ROTC Brigade 


[TfADERShId] 


jXCELLENCfl 


Kingstor 
« Ptpughkeep: 


Ashtabula 


oledo 


O Central Hub 
O Mountain Hub 
O Northeast Hub 
O Southeast Hub 
O Satellite 


late College 


iswick 


Atlantic dW 


^Athens. 


rleston 


iricksburg 


•^ynchburcj 


tersburj 




Jackj/fotintam 


.Virginia Beach 


I'D -itiagliar^All rights r^ser' 


Elizabeth City 


r /.\ f pbij si!-; ni hiip^riiiips.e^ps'Jii.oorn. 


pH c Q ; Kmn 

... 

■L.Z-k: 

Fairmo , 

^fersb^_^,C 


Martinsbur 

WES T-'-Jv 

/■ R fi'lf N 1 

Winchester^ 

i a/ / Jff 


— 1 i 


jf l 




l-I. 

yS 

A v 

\ i 
f ) 


. 





ri^jjf 





aderpjiia 




80 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 
™ Brigade 
2" d , 3 rd & ROTC Brigade 

Remarks 



■ 



^g?th DIV(IT), 8th SROTC Brigade 
7 th f gth f iQth & nth ROTC Brigade 


Commander 
COL William Soderberg 

Command Sergeant Major 
CSM Edward Evans 




o4 tn PIV(IT), o tn 5ROTC 

Brigade 

7 th , 9 th , 10 th & 11 th ROTC 



B 

.gth/ 84 th Brigade 
SROTC: 

Milwaukee, Wl. 

Supports Cadet 
Command ROTC 
Detachments with 88 
TPU soldiers throughout 
the 7 th & 9 th ROTC 
Brigade. 



United States Army 

Cadet Command Headquarters 

To commission the future officer 
leadership of the US Army and motivate 
young people to be better citizens 


University 

Officers Enlisted 

Assigned 

Assigned 

Brigade Staff 

5 

8 

Marquette University 

7 

4 

UW-Oshkosh 

6 

6 

Kent State 

4 

2 

Capital University 

9 

3 

Central Mchigan University 

0 

3 

Ul-Chicago 

3 

0 

UW-Madison 

2 

1 

E. MU-Yspilanti 

1 

2 

UM-Ann Arbor 

4 

2 

Western Michigan University 

4 

1 

Notie Dame University 

2 

1 

Indiana State 

1 

0 

Central State University 

1 

0 

Mchigan State 

2 

0 

Mankato State 

1 

0 

S. Indiana University 

0 

3 

Total: 

52 

36 


■ 






04 UI UIV(I I J, O' 

Brigade 

7 th , 9 th , 10 th & ll th ROTC 

uw- Oshko® /v Dlfig^^ reenbay 



t Norberts Colle 
Ripon College 


University of Illinois 
Chicago State 


Otterbein College 

Notre Dame 


W- Madison 



84TH DIV (IT) 
MILWAUKEE, WI 

W 7 Milwaukee ^ region e 


rquette University 


ichigan - Ann Arbor 
stern Michigan 

niversity of Michigan 


Rose Hulman 


-Ferris State 
- — -Youngstown State 

Denison University 
pitol University 

nt State 
Mount Union College 


Southern Indiana 


m 




04 UI LIIV|I I ), O l " 5KU I L 

Brigade 

7 th , 9 th , 10 th & ll th ROTC 
Brigade 

Remarks 



• Effective 1 Oct 04, 84th Division (IT) 
reorganizes to become the 84th Reserve 
Training Command at Ft. McCoy, Wl 

• Subordinate brigades will be merged 
with the 100th Division over the course 
of FY05 

• 8/100 will be the new SROTC HQ, taking 
control overTPU instructor personnel in 
IN, IL, KY, MN, Ml, OH, TN, Wl 



m 

3 95*1 DIV(IT), 8th SROTC Brigade 
10th,llth & 12th ROTC Brigades 

Commander 
LTC Randy LeCompte 


■ 


Command Sergeant Major 
CSM Paul Hill 





th DIV(IT) f 8 th SROTC Brigad 
10 th , 11 th & 12 th ROTC Brigades 



. gth/95th Brigade 
SROTC: Stillwater, OK. 

Supports Cadet 
Command ROTC 
Detachments with 41 
TPU soldiers throughout 
the 10 th , 11 th & 12 th 
ROTC Brigades. 



United States Army 
Cadet Command Headquarters 


University 

Officers Enlisted 

Assigned 

Assigned 

UTA/SMU/UNT 

5 

2 

WASH/LINDEN WOOD 

6 

2 

Creighton 

2 

0 

Texas A&M Kingsville 

0 

1 

Univ of Houston/TX Southern 

1 

0 

UT-S A/Palo Alto 

2 

0 

KU/Washbum 

0 

1 

Central AK 

2 

1 

HSU/OBU 

1 

0 

TCU 

4 

0 

Tarleton 

1 

0 

Dubuque 

1 

0 

UCO/Langston/Rose State 

2 

1 

MWSC 

4 

2 

Total: 

31 

10 


To commission the future officer 
leadership of the US Army and motivate 
young people to be better citizens 


m 



5 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Briga 
10 th , 11 th & 12 th ROTC Brigades 



☆ 

() 

o 



Washburn Univ. (U of KS) 

Rose State College 
(UCO) 

Langsto n Univ . /So Naz 

Univ. North Texas ( 

Arlington) 

SMU 
(TCU) 

Tarleton St. 


95TH DIV (IT) 
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 
REGION F 


!xcellenc£ ) 
UN Nebraska^ Omaha 
(Creighton 
University) 

UNI-Dubugue 

UMKC (MoWSC) 

NW Missouri 
tl&ndenwood 
Univ. 

'1 

UA-Little Rock 

Henderson 
State/ Ouachita 
Baptist 


BDE HQ's 
Host School 

Augmentation / 
Partnership^ Non-TDA 
School 


them (U of 

o Alt<H6g£ta£H) (UT-San 
"Antonio) 

Texas A&M - Corpus 
Christi 

(TX A&M Kingsville/Del 
Mar) 


m 


G&5 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Briga 
10 th f ll th & 12 th ROTC Brigades 

Remarks 

2 AC replacement missions: 

- University of Central Oklahoma 

- University of Central Arkansas 

2 OIF selective mobilizations 


2 Soldiers currently alerted for 
mobilization 


• |>8 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Bde 
I st & 2 nd ROTC Brigades 


Commander 
COL Mark Ricketts 


CSM 

CSM Herbert Whaley 


Presenter: LTC Ken McClellan 





8 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Bde 
st & 2nd roTC Brigades 



. 8 TH/ 98 th Brigade 
SROTC: West Hartford, 
CT. Supports Cadet 
Command ROTC 
Detachments with 71 
TPU soldiers throughout 
the 1st ROTC brigade. 



United States Army 

Cadet Command Headquarters 

To commission the future officer 
leadership of the US Army and motivate 
young people to be better citizens 


University 

Officers Enlisted 

Assigned 

Assigned 

Boston University 

1 

0 

Canisius College 

8 

4 

Clarkson College 

1 

0 

Fordham University 

6 

1 

Hofstia University 

9 

3 

Niagara University 

3 

4 

Northeastern University 

6 

2 

St Bonaventuie University 

0 

1 

Syracuse University 

5 

1 

University of Connecticut 

3 

1 

University of Maine 

2 

0 

University of Massachusetts 

1 

0 

University of Vermont 

2 

0 

Cornell University 

3 

0 

Siena University 

4 

0 

Total: 

54 

17 


■ 




8 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Bde 


\ st & 2 nd ROTC Brigades 



Syracuse University 


University of Vermo 



98TH DIV (IT) 
ROCHESTER, 
REGION A 


Niagara Unive 
Canisius Coll 



University of Maine 


St BonaventuiSiena Col 
Seton H 


UMass/Amherst 

Northeastern University 
Boston College 


Rutgers Unive 


University of Connecticut 

Hofstra University 
Saint John's 

Fordham University 

Hfl 




• 8 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Bde 
st & 2nd roTC Brigades 


Remarks 


• Distance Learning 

- Downloading 

- Time Requirements 




100 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 
Brigade 

& 8th ROTC Brigade 


Commander 
COL Frank Argabright 


Command Sergeant Major 
CSM Otha Allen 




100 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 
™ Brigade 
7 th & 8th ROTC Brigade 



. gTH/iooth Brigade 
SROTC: Ft. Knox, KY. 

Supports Cadet 
Command ROTC 
Detachments with 41 
TPU soldiers throughout 
the 7 th ROTC brigade. 


University 

Officers Enlisted 

Assigned 

Assigned 

University of Kentucky 

4 

6 

Eastern Kentucky University 

4 

3 

Niddle Tennessee State Univ 

5 

1 

University of Louisville 

2 

0 

Western Kentucky University 

2 

1 

UT Knoxville 

1 

0 

Carson Newman College 

1 

0 

Austin Peay State University 

2 

2 

University of Memphis 

0 

1 

University of North Alabama 

1 

1 

J acksonville State University 

3 

1 

Total: 

25 

16 



United States Army 

Cadet Command Headquarters 

To commission the future officer 
leadership of the US Army and motivate 
young people to be better citizens 


■ 




rc Jt 100 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 
™ Brigade 
7 th & 8 th ROTC Brigade 

8 th Brigade's APMS (A) Department - FY 



TENNESSEE 

MIDDLE TENN STATE 
UNIV 

CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY 

UNIVERSITY OF 
TENNESSEE 


UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS 

CARSON NEWMAN 
COLLEGE 



AUSTIN PEAY STATE UN 


KENTUCKY 

UNIVERSITY OF 
KENTUCKY 

CENTRE COLLEGE 
ASBURY COLLEGE 

UNIVERSITY OF 
LOUISVILLE 

EASTERN KENTUCKY 
UNVERSITY 

CUMBERLAND COLLEGE 

WESTERN KENTUCKY 


UNIVERSITY 

ALABAMA 

JACKSONVILLE STATE 
UNIVERSITY 

GADSEN STATE COLLEGE 

UNIV OF NORTH ALABAMA 


■ 




nn 100 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC « 

Brigade fC7§l 

7 th & 8th ROTC Brigade HxcellencI I 

Uh Brigade's APMS (A) Department - FY 05 


8 th Bde HO 
Q - Host 
© - Partnership 



m 




rc A 100 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 
™ Brigade 
7 th & 8th ROTC Brigade 


Remarks 



• Transition of 100 th Div (IT) & 84 th Div (IT) 

• LTC Mission Support 

• LDAC Mission Support (SAW) 



^ 104 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 

Brigade 13 th & 14 th ROTC Brigades 

Commander 
LTC Bruce Mulkey 

Command Sergeant Major 
CSM James Davis 


Presenter: LTC Malcolm Lee 





104 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 
gade 13 th & 14 th ROTC Brigades 



8 TH/io4th Brigade SROTC: 

Ft Lewis, WA. (104 th Div at 
Vancouver Barracks, WA) 
Supports Cadet Command 
ROTC Detachments with 36 
TPU soldiers throughout 
the 13 th & 14 th ROTC 
Brigades. 



United States Army 

Cadet Command Headquarters 

To commission the future officer 
leadership of the US Army and motivate 
young people to be better citizens 


University 

Officers Enlisted 

Assianed 

Assianed 

UNLV (NV) 

5 

6 

S.D. School of Mines &Technoloav 

1 

0 

ARIZONA STATE (AZ) 

2 

0 

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 

1 

0 

BRIGHAM YOUNG (UT) 

1 

0 

CLARK COLLEGE (WA) 

1 

1 

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON 

1 

0 

PACIFIC LUTHERAN (WA) 

4 

0 

PORTLAND STATE (OR) 

1 

0 

SEATTLE UNIVERSITY (WA) 

2 

2 

UCLA(CA) 

2 

0 

UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA (MT) 

1 

0 

UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO (CA) 

0 

1 

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH (UT) 

1 

0 

UTAH STATE (UT) 

1 

0 

WEBER STATE (UT) 

1 

0 

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY 

1 

0 

Total: 

26 

10 


■ 




104 th 
13 th & 


DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 
14 th ROTC Brigades 



University of 


Clark College 


University of Montana 


University 
Pacific Lutheran 

104TH DIV (IT 
VANCOUVER, Wj 
REGION 

Portland State 


Univ of S.E 

Univ of Ca: 

Cal State University 

UNLV 

UCLA 



Weber State 


S.D. School of 
Mines 


niversity of Utah 


gham Young 
izona State 






104 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC 
gade 13 th & 14 th ROTC Brigades 



Remarks 

• Pilot program started in '98 at Seattle 
University was a success, resulting in Pacific 
Lutheran University (satellite) to become 
host program in 2001. 

• Current program at UNLV (host: UNR) is a big 
success for Cadet Command and USARC 

• Support for 2004 Warrior Forge. Provide 
soldier skills training in 5 training 
committees. Supervise and support all USAR 
in support of WF. Over 1,000 USAR 
personnel supported. 



108 th DIV(IT), 9 th SROTC 
Brigade 

4 th , 5 th & 6 th SROTC Brigades 


Commander 
COL Stuart M. Dyer 


■ 


Command Sergeant Major 
CSM Dennis A. Nance 




4 th , 5 th 


108 th DIV(IT) f 9 th SROTC 
Brigade 

& 6 th SROTC Brigades 



. 9 TH/io8th Brigade 
SROTC: Charlotte, NC. 
Supports Cadet 
Command ROTC 
Detachments with 55 
TPU soldiers throughout 
the 4 th , 5 th & 6 th ROTC 
Brigades. 



United States Army 


University 

Officers Enlisted 

Assigned 

Assigned 

North Carolina A & T Greensboro, NC 

3 

5 

UNC -Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 

7 

1 

USC-South Carolina, Columbia, SC 

1 

2 

Benedict College, Columbia, SC 

1 

2 

Morris College, Sumter, SC 

1 

1 

University of Puerto Rio, Rio Piedras 

4 

3 

University of Puerto Rio, Mayaguez 

4 

1 

Presbyterian College, Clinton, SC 

4 

0 

University of Central Florida, Orlando, 

3 

0 

Valencia Comm College, Orlando, FL 

2 

0 

Sem Community College, Orlando, FL 

1 

0 

Georgia Inst of Technology Atlanta, G 

3 

1 

Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA 

2 

0 

Kennesaw State University, Kennesa\ 

2 

1 

Total: 

38 

17 


To commission the future officer 
leadership of the US Army and motivate 
young people to be better citizens 








■ 


♦UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO 
AT MAYAGUEZ 



lUo tn DIV(IT) f 9 tn SROTC 
Brigade 

4 th , 5 th , 6 th & 8 th SROTC 
Brigades 

Remarks 

• Improved communications/multiple 
touch points 




Working Group #1 - Issue #1 


• Issue : Identify potential Soldiers who are able to go 
on 179-day TTAD/ADSW tour IAW provisions outlined 
at: 

http://www.rotc.monroe.army.mil/command/reserve_request.html 

• Discussion : Since no TDY funds are available for this 
program, it must be a local program utilizing soldiers 
available in the vicinity of each requesting university. Funding 
for these tours to be drawn from USACC funds. 

• Recommendation : Universities needing this support 
should first seek approval from their AC brigade. The AC 
brigade validates the requirement and ensures funds are 
available. Once the requirement is validated, the AC brigade 
contacts the supporting RC SROTC brigade, which then 
advertises the specific requirement to all RC soldiers in the 
university area. SROTC Bdes may keep a standing list of 




Working Group #1 - Issue #2 



* Issue : Should we fund recently commissioned 
Reserve LTs to go on tour up to 179-days in support of 
USACC's LDAC/LTC/JROTC summer training courses. 
Who pays? 


* Discussion : Reserve LTs often have to wait up to 
180+ days before they can attend OBC. If they are 
brought on active duty immediately post- 
commissioning, can USACC provide meaningful work 
for them at LDACC or otherwise - work that both 
benefits the soldier and the Army? USARC has no 
funds for this. 


* Recommendation : Reserve LTs would be better used 
as Gold Bar Recruiters. USAR and USARNG may be 
interested in funding Gold Bar Recruiters who will be 
oriented on recruiting potential Reserve / Guard-bound 
cadets. USACC may wish to consider funding slots for 




Working Group #1 - Issue #3 



* Issue : Review USACC's Reserve Partnership Way Ahead, 
and comment on DIV(IT)/USACC partnership opportunities, 
such as dedicated Ranger Challenge event support, FTX 
support, & etc. 

* Discussion: Way Ahead does not address utilization of 
TPU support and coordination required to optimize this 
cooperative effort. 

* Recommendation : 

- Formalize TPU augmentation via MOU 

- Determine magnitude of support requirements 
(establishes footprint of desired TPU support) 

- Include 8 th Bde reps at USACC Bde training 
conferences 

- USACC identify types of dedicated support required I 
for LDAC (enables 8 th Bdes to determine feasibility of 



Working Group #1 - Issue #4 


* Issue : There is no Memorandum of Understanding 
between USACC and USARC 

* Discussion: This lack is presenting difficulties to our 
soldiers in the utilization of soldiers by PMSs. 

* Recommendation : Cadet Command and USARC 

should jointly develop a Memorandum of Understanding 
regarding utilization of TPU soldiers. The MoU should 
cover: 

• Duties of TPU Instructors 

• Rating Scheme OER/NCOER 

• COMTEK/TPU status policy 

• Instructor Qualifications 

• Process for annual review of schools using or needing TPU support 

* Action Agency: (USACC. COL Harrell, ph/fax/email) _ 



Working Group #1 - Issue #5 


■ Issue : Mobilization Mission 

■ Discussion: SROTC brigades do not have a unit 
mobilization mission, other than furnishing individual 
replacements, as needed. 

■ Recommendation : USARC and USACC should jointly 

examine the mobilization mission of 8 th brigades. 

* Recommend that the 8 th Bde be given a mobilization 
mission similar to the mission performed by TASS 
brigades and Drill Sergeant brigades, and given the 
mission of assuming responsibility for host school 
cadre. 

* This may require derivative UlCs for each school 




■ 


Action Agency: (USACC. COL Harrell, ph/fax/email) 



Working Group #1 - Issue #6 


* Issue : Metrics 

* Discussion: There currently is no method of measuring 
the effectiveness of utilizing TPU soldiers as SROTC 
instructors. 

* Recommendation : Develop standard measurements 

based on recruiting, enrollment, retention, commissioning, 
LDAC scoring. 

* Compare performance of schools with TPU 
augmentation vs schools without TPU augmentation. 

* Compare performance of schools with TPU 
augmentation vs the performance of the school prior to 
TPU augmentation. 

* Action Agency: (Organization. Officer, ph/fax/email) 

wa 




Working Group #2 



Training & Training Support 

for 

LDAC, LTC, JROTC & CTLT 



Working Group Two 



USAR Support to: 


• LTC 

• Ranger Challenge 

• LDAC 

• CTLT 

• JROTC 




USAR Support 2004 
Leadership Training Course 



USAR Soldiers and Officers 
Personnel Spaces to support 
184 LTC at Fort Knox KY 


17 Average Tour Length 

days 



USAR Support 2004 
Leadership Training Course 



USAR Committee Responsibility: 

- FLRC 

- 9MM Range 

- Map Reading / Land Navigation 

- Holding Company 




USAR Support 2004 
Leadership Training Course 



6 Companies 2004 with Projected 7 Companies 
2005 

- (TRADOC) Projected of 7 would decrement BCT 
starts at Fort Knox 


- (USAR) Projected of 7 would not increase spaces 
but time frame would increase faces 

USARC Annual Training Planning Conference - 
August 04 




USAR Support 2004 
Ranger Challenge/FTX's 


Competing Resources 



• Decentralized and varied throughout Cadet 
Command 

• Constrained Resources v. past OPTEMPO 

• Increased requirements to USAR Soldiers 

• Timing Challenge with FY Budgeting 
Resolution: Formal mission request in order to 
adequately plan and provide resources 




USAR Support 2004 

dership Development and Assessment Cours 




USAR Soldiers and Officers will 
support LDAC at Fort Lewis WA 


Personnel High Watermark - 
July 

Personnel Spaces 



USAR Support 2004 

adership Development and Assessment Cour 



28 

$? rM 

August 


First Soldier on the Ground 
Last Soldier Departs 


17 

d ir 

days 


Average Tour Length 
Longest Tour Length 




USAR Major Supporting Units 



94 th DIV 
100 th DIV 
63 rd RRC 
80 th RRC 
88 th RRC 
96 th RRC 


95 th DIV 
104 th DIV 
70 th RRC 
81 st RRC 
89 th RRC 
99 th RRC 


98 th DIV 
108 th DIV 
77 th RRC 
84 th RRC 
90 th RRC 
2 x CRCs 


■ 


Including approximately 15 TTAD 
personnel 




LDAC Major Activities Supported 



Automatic Weapons Range 

Individual Tactical Training 

Hand Grenade Range 

Basic Rifle Marksmanship 

Nuclear Biological and Chemical 

Training 


CommittSup^|Qillt5a)ndeTlTat%Sf)l(MTMaonnits 2-3 

summer is a rotation year 



LDAC Future Support 



ITT, HG, BRSM, and AW Committees 

Spaces v. faces based on time and 
cadets 

- 14 Regiments (5200/4800) 

- Largest 348 

- Smallest 271 




LDAC Future Support 



August - September examination of 
support and regiments 


Close working relationship with 104 th 
DIV 


Tie in with installation support 



USAR Supported CTLT 


-2004 USAR Support CTLT 
Cadet Command CTLT 586 Slots 
Total with internships 840 Slots 
USAR Pilot Program Slots 12 (6) 


2005 CTLT Goal of 1000-1500 



USAR Supported CTLT 



"Win - Win" Situation 

Marketing tool for the USAR 
Educational along the One Army model 
Availability of additional slots 


Challenge = timing of CTLT with unit training 




Past Support 


USAR Support to JROTC 



• Decentralized and varied throughout Cadet Command 

• Constrained Resource v. past OPTEMPO 

• Increased requirements to USAR Soldier 


Developing Raider Challenge for 2005 

- 35-40 USAR Soldiers 

Drill Championships March 2005 

- 2 days 25 USAR Soldiers ea. Region 


Cadet Leadership Challenge 121 "Camps" 



Working Group #3 




Problem Statement 


The Army Reserve lacks an effective 
training strategy to ensure all Direct 
Commission candidates achieve pre- 
commissioning competencies 




Working Group #3 - Issue # 1 



* Issue: How should USARC implement and task-organize 
centralized C2 for the Officer Development Course (ODC) 

• Discussion : At present, the pilot is in its 2 nd generation; 
USACC will not provide expanded ARG2G support until the 
Reserve task-organizes central C2 and ownership of the 
initiative, and enforces BOLC-I calibrated standards in 
training. 

* Recommendation : The USARC G7 has recommended 
that the current ARG2G program conducted by the DIVs 
(IT) be terminated. State and federal OCS, ROTC and 
direct commission capabilities need to be utilized to 
address LT shortages in the Army Reserve. The 84 th 
ARRTC can work with USACC to develop a functional 
training course (ODC) for direct commissionees to ensure 
that pre-commissioning competencies are achieved. 


Artinn Ananrw ■ /Q/lth A D DT C' I oarlor nQ\/QlnnmQnf 



Working Group #3 - Issue # 2 


£xcellenc£ 

* Issue: What BOLC I knowledges, skills, abilities 
(KSA) must be achieved? How will the Army Reserve 
assess prospective candidates and ensure KSAs are 
met at time of commissioning? 

* Discussion: All commissionees must possess a solid 
baseline of USAAC approved BOLC l/pre-commissioning 
competencies 

* Recommendation : 84 th ARRTC participate in the 
USAAC 4GOLD Committee to ensure standardization. 

The Army Reserve develop a training strategy based 
on TRADOC's systems approach to training (SAT) 
beginning with a needs analysis of the target 
population. 

* Action Agency: (84 th ARRTC, Leader Development M 
Directorate, (608) 388-7113) 




Working Group #3 - Issue # 3 



* Issue: What should the training strategy look like? 

* Discussion : A DS or NCO of the year possesses a 
different skill set than a recently degreed PFC or CPL. 
Different tracks for different skill sets may need to be 
developed. 

* Recommendation : The needs analysis will identify 
the best training options based on Soldier 
competencies and organizational structure. 

* Action Agency: (84th ARRTC, Leader Development 
Directorate, (608) 388-7113) 




Preliminary 
Tracks and Timeline 


01 


Q2 


Q3 



Sep 





Inprocessing 

1. APFT 

2. Admin 

3. Standards 

4. Board Prep 

5. Verify Locs 

6. Counseling 


3oard 

Weekend 

Saturday 
Test Day 

APFT 
Land Nav 
BRM 

Swim Test 
5. 22-5 Demo 

Sunday 

Board 

1. Class A inspect 

2. Interview 

3. Board Decision 

4. Assign Tracks 

5. Counsel Standards 


Officer Developmep 

(DL/ADT) Msn: 25-75 ► | 

Highly selective; 
designed for DS/NCO of 
the year; train on 
ethics, ethos, creed, 


Federal OCS 

(14 wks ADT) 

Msn: 120 


values & staff ride 


Colurse 


State OCS 

(ADT/IDT/ADT) 

Msn: 100-200 


Imperatives 

• Centralize Direct commissioning Training Effort; requires Reserve-wide ownership and authority for viability. 

Recommend ARRTC's DOLD. 

• Mission the Reserve's C2 Matrix and HRC-St. Louis to provide candidates for both OCS and Direct 
Commissioning. G-l missions the RRCs and commanders answer to the CAR with annually reviewed results. 

• Incentivize candidates with the right stuff to take the time out to become an officer by insuring they retain 
current enlistment/re-enlistment bonuses. 

• Market the Scholar, Athlete, Leader 


• Resource the Cadre from the Army Reserve SROTC Bdes to execute the training 




Working Group #3 - Issue # 4 



* Issue: How will the Army Reserve G-l determine 
missioning requirements and enforce those production 
goals? How can the senior leadership help? How should 
the direct commission program be marketed? 


* Discussion: HRC-St. Louis stipulates it can/should 
identify all degreed Soldiers throughout the Army 
Reserve with the S-A-L prerequisites for direct 
commissioning. At issue is how can direct commissioning 
be marketed and promoted within the Army Reserve to 
attain the CAR's objective to direct-commission upwards 
of 600 officers per year? 


* Recommendation : Utilize the Retention Transition 
Division (RTD) assets within the RRCs. RTD has the 
capability to identify and assign mission distribution and 
use officer commissioning as an incentive to retain 
qualified applicants. 



Potential Mission Changes 
or all Commissioning Sources 



BLUF * Ramp up OCS to 250 immediately, then throttle down after FY09 

• Ramp up ROTC to 1100 during FY07-FY09 & maintain as pri. comm. 

• Ramp up Dir. Comm, to 550 during FY05-FY09, then throttle down 
* Use ARG2G to put officership in the direct commission strategy 


Fed OCS 

FY04 FYQ5 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 


Remarks 



120 

120 

120 

120 

120 

120 





Additional OCS 


130 

130 

130 

130 

130 


Implement immediate 

i OCS mission 

of 250 













ROTC 

670 

670 

650 

650 

650 

650 






Nurses 

n/a 

n/a 

25 

50 

75 

100 






Additional ROTC 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

150 

250 

350 


Total ROTC mission ramps up Id 1100 byFY09 













AR Dir. Comm 

200 

200 

200 

200 

200 

200 






AMEDD Dir. Comm. 


50 

50 

50 

50 

50 


Normal medical offcer access ions rate 

Genuine Dir. Comm. 


50 

50 

50 

50 

50 


Genuine, highlyqualiffed Dir. Comm. Soldiers 

Program Dir. Comm. 


100 

100 

100 

100 

100 


Training program using Ft McCoy 


Increase Dir Comm 


100 

275 

300 

325 

350 


Training program using Ft McCoy 


























Currently Missioned 
Delta 

990 

990 

230 

995 

405 

1020 

580 

1045 

1070 


6110 

Total Commissions w/o Change 

705 

830 


2750 

Total Additional Commissions 


source 

Implement 

Centralize 

Standardize 

Webify 

Incentivize 

Mission 

Select 

Train 

Certify 

Commission 


Revised Missions FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 


Federal OCS 

250 

250 

250 

250 

250 

NG State OCS 

150 

150 

150 

150 

150 

ROTC 

670 

675 

750 

825 

900 



Working Group #3 - Issue # 5 

I jXCELLENC^ 

• Issue: How will the Army Reserve fund the incentives to 
promote market interest; how will those $$ be distributed? 
When should candidates be paid (upon commissioning or in 
phased amounts)? 

• Discussion : Need to know what un-programmed or 
existing $$ can be leveraged for FY05 Direct Commissioning 
objectives and beyond. ROTC uses $7500 stipend and 
scholarships. What's the right amount for the Army Reserve, 
and how rapidly can this amount be utilized? 

• Recommendation : Recommend change to current policies 
to allow the CAR to waive the recoupment of enlistment/re- 
enlistment bonuses. NDAA FY 04 authorizes incentives for 
officer accessions. The Army Reserve is requesting 
clarification thru DA G1 on applicability to TPU Soldiers. 


Action Agency: (USARC. Gl, (404) 464-XXXX) 




Working Group #3 - Issue # 6 



* Issue: Where should the Training Cells be located? 
How many should be staffed to attain a 500-LT annual 
mission? How will the SROTC Bdes/DIV(IT)s task 
organize IAW geographic boundaries of the 14 ROTC 
Bdes? Should the training cells be OPCON, attached, or 
assigned to the 84 th ARRTC leadership? How should 
their cadre be resourced? 


* Discussion: SROTC Bdes are aligned within DIV (IT) 
boundaries. Location of Training Cells will vary and is 
not necessarily critical to the execution. 

* Recommendation : The needs analysis needs to look 
at demographics to determine Training Cell 
allocations. ARFP will redistribute FTS and TPU assets 
to support. A proposal to align the Army Reserve 
SROTC Bdes under the 84 th ARRTC is being considered. 


Arf Ananriri (Q/lfh A D DTP I o^rlor nQ\/Qlnnmnnf 




Working Group #3 - Issue # 7 



* Issue: How should awarding of direct commissions be 
controlled, such that those candidates who do not meet the 
standard, or who demonstrate consistent mediocrity, are culled 
from the program? Who has disenrollment authority? How can 
direct-commission packets be held in abeyance at HRC-St. Louis 
and then 'greenlighted' for commission letters to be posted 
once training benchmarks have been attained? 


• Discussion : USACC readily disenrolls those cadets who 
display a lack of physical/mental hardiness, 

reliability/accountability, and a strong commitment to an ethical 
standard. The Army Reserve must not fail to exercise quality 
hygiene measures by disenrolling those who are 
physically/mentally/ethically substandard or mediocre at best. 
HRC-St. Louis continue to pre-screen applicants and board 
process. 


• Recommendation : Establish centralized business rules for 
national standardization. Decentralize the execution of the 
selection and training process to the RRCs. 



Working Group #3 - Issue # 8 


£xcellenc£ 

* Issue: How should boards be administered? What is 
the right composition of officers and NCOS on the 
board? 

* Discussion: HRC-St. Louis currently conducts 
boards quarterly to appoint candidates nominated by 
the RRCs. HRC-St. Louis establishes board schedules 
and policies and RRCs execute policies. 

* Recommendation : Establish RRC board policies and 
standards to ensure consistency across the Army 
Reserve. Focused on training potential as well as 
eligibility standards. 


Action Aaencv: (USARC. G1 ICW HRC-St. Louis) 




Concluding Remarks 
And 

Discussion 


■ 



Backup Slides 




Workshop Instructions and 
Operating Procedure 



* Discussion (Group Leader note timeline and adhere; put 
egos on hold; move discussion along) 

* Task Organize (break up into sub-groups to nail down 
the due-outs NLT COB Tues) 

* Start off early AM Thurs & maintain strong work tempo 

* Record draft due-outs on CDRW 

* Brief IPR to COL Harrell at 1130, Wed 

* Develop due-outs and brief MG Thrasher 1600, Wed 

* Coordinate with other working groups for related issues 
and deconflict conflicting resourcing goals 

* Brief IPR to COL Harrell at 1130, Friday 

* Finalize due-outs, & prep for DCG Brief to BG Sealock 

* Summit close-out brief to DCG, BG Sealock at 1500, 
Fridav